Give It Away, Give It Away, Give It Away Now

Sixteen years ago, Partners for Progress successfully lobbied the city to spend over $15 million of your (the taxpayer) money to launch a major development on the West End of Oak Ridge. The promises were enough to make people starry eyed. There was to be a picturesque subdivision of nearly 4,000 homes along with an industrial complex that, when all was said and done, would produce 17,000 jobs, $1 billion in payroll, and nearly $13 million in additional annual property taxes.  

Three years ago, many of the same folks behind Partners for Progress began a similar PR campaign touting the sale and redevelopment of the mall. “More shopping choices are coming!” they proclaimed. To date, the city has approved the use of $1.5 million of your money for infrastructure costs and a $13 million TIF which will  suppress property tax revenue at current levels for the next 30 years.  In other words, no matter what happens, the 64 acres will continue, as it has for the last decade, to produce only 10% of its original value because any increases will be used to repay the TIF loan.  Developers and city officials claim that the project will produce $1M (or 20%) in additional sales tax revenue to the city, though, historically, the national retail sales growth rate range is between -11.51% to +11.18%. Even if we find a way around the notoriously stringent Wal-Mart non-compete covenants and actually bring in real retail, it is absolutely impossible to expect these projections to materialize, since, even in the best of times, we’ve not seen half that level of growth.

Three months ago, CVMR announced their move to Oak Ridge by stating that they’d hired its first employee, would hire 620 more  and would begin operations by May. This month, we learned that CVMR is seeking a 14 year, 100% tax abatement  on its personal property. No dollar value of that abatement has been shared publicly as of yet.

What do these three scenarios have in common? All have been touted as major developments that would save our city,  all involve taxpayer subsidies and, as of today, NONE of them have actually transpired. Rarity Ridge flopped. The mall has yet to sell and, contrary to what we were led to believe, the CVMR deal has not been sealed.

I share all of this not to celebrate failure  but to avoid repeating it. According to a report recently released by Leonard  Abbatiello of the Equalization Board, “Property tax exempt properties are increasing at a rate five times the growth rate of taxable properties.” This means that you, the homeowner or small business are subsidizing the very entities that are supposed to counterbalance your property taxes.  To grasp just how large the problem is, consider this: 1,000 acres valued at $6,000,000 yields no taxes and another $60,000,000 in properties yield only half of the required taxes due to city-approved tax abatements. Imagine how much the city could shave off your home’s property taxes if we were collecting the full amount on all of these properties. Better yet, ask  for the exact calculation of the next person who tries to tell you how little a tax increase will cost the average homeowner.

Mr. Abbatiello’s report underscores just how important it is that we exercise fiscal restraint at this point in our history especially considering that some of the same proponents of these initiatives are also pushing council to increase property taxes. Yes, those who are quick to forego taxing a chosen few want you to pay more. Not only that, but many of those same people either directly benefit from tax breaks and/or have their salaries paid for by the you, the taxpayer. 

In a recent letter to City Council, ORNL director Thom Mason warned us not to wait on the mall or CVMR revenues to materialize before taking more of your money. Never mind that you fund his salary to the tune of over $700,000 per year; or that the majority of his employees live in Farragut (who does not charge their homeowners a property tax); or that his facilities reside on thousands of acres of nontaxable land within Oak Ridge. No, if we want to attract new residents from the jobs we’ve been promised are coming, Dr. Mason says that we need to increase property taxes now.

Another advocate for taking more of your money is BOE Vice Chair Bob Eby. Mr. Eby has asked that you give up Starbucks coffee for water to fund a property tax increase. Ironically, Mr. Eby’s former company, USEC, for whom he is identified as an owner within the PILT application, was given multiple 50% tax breaks by the IDB in 2008. Those tax breaks were based on a number of promises that never materialized, including that of 408 jobs.  Yet now, Mr. Eby’s current company, which regrouped after USEC filed for bankruptcy, continues to reap the benefits from USEC’s tax breaks.

Finally, the loudest cheerleader for taking more of your money is also one of the largest beneficiaries of your generosity. Every year, the Chamber of Commerce, who is largely made up of  non-tax paying  members (non-profits, government organizations and non-Oak Ridge businesses) urges its members to pressure council to increase the property tax rate. What they aren’t saying is that nearly two cents of your property taxes ($175,000) is budgeted annually just for them; that they are squatting on city owned land for less than $800 per year; or that they  pay ZERO property taxes on that land and their $755,000 building. Of course they want more of your money. Look at how much they stand to lose if they were forced to operate like a real business-supported Chamber of Commerce!

At some point, you’ve got start holding us accountable for your money. If all of these tax incentives were so lucrative, why does your local government need to keep asking you for more? Why should you pay more taxes when those who are asking for it don’t want to pay their fair share? And why should you trust the city and the schools with more when they waste so much of what you already give them (think quarter-million dollar bathrooms and parking lots)?

I will not vote to increase your property taxes. It’s wrong in every sense of the word. But I am only one of seven. You are 29,000 and we’ve started to see a glimpse of your power in recent months. The only way to prevent further waste by government is to limit its access to your pocketbook. You have multiple opportunities to be heard at City Council and Board of Education meetings. At the very minimum, you may speak for 3 minutes on any subject not on council’s agenda and, at the most, an additional 3 minutes on each and every item on the agenda of any given meeting. You can also make your voice heard via letters to the editor, social media, phone calls and emails.  The finalization of the 2016 budget has yet to occur and may not for at least another month. I encourage all Oak Ridgers to use this gift of additional time to make your voices heard on this and any other city matters that concern you. This is YOUR government. Of the people, by the people, for the people.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Give It Away, Give It Away, Give It Away Now

  1. So many thoughts are running through my head right now… First and foremost, why in the Hell do you think the Chamber cooked up that little “PAC” tactic prior to the last election? We all know the answer to that one…
    Bob Eby…. Hhmmmmphh, no comment.
    Rarity Ridge, the mall, how many belly flops must some take prior to learning a lesson?
    I think I may have figured out why Mr. Lee hates you so much. It could be that you threaten his paycheck every time you speak with logic against the ever present “yes man” vote. He is, after all employed by the company in charge of renovating the Jackson Square parking lot. Was he involved with the bathroom deal as well?
    I am SICK of certain pockets in this town being lined with gold while the average “Linda” gets taxed to the poor house!

    1. One cannot fix the problem without knowing from where that problem stems… She is simply identifying the root of the problem so that we may all find a solution.

  2. Thank you Trina! No more tax increases,No special deals. You give us the honest truth! We appreciate that so very much! Blessings!

  3. I guess ORNL, Y-12, USEC, etc. can take their money elsewhere because those organizations are basically funding the non-profits in this area…not to mention the hundreds of thousands they have put back in to the community for things like the marina, the new Emory Valley Center, the, etc. Not mention that Y-12 and ORNL (X-10) were here first and built the city. They might not be paying bringing much direct tax revenue to the city, but I don’t think you would like the city too much if those entities were gone. Perhaps CVMR and Crosland Southeast can take their businesses and jobs elsewhere and we can allow the current mall to crumble and continue to be an eyesore. I’m fine with footing the bill for a few things if it means hundreds of jobs will come to the city and we will get some progress. Perhaps you are simply against progress and demand everything be on your terms Ms. Baughn?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s